Inline Insights

The government continues to prioritise tech policy in the UK with London Tech Week, the Spending Review and AI Summit London all highlighting the important role government expects tech to play in driving economic growth. Here are some reflections on what it may mean: 

SUMMARY

• Both the Spending Review (SR) and London Tech Week had a heavy AI focus, with government committing to making the UK ‘the best place for Tech and AI’.

• This commitment included £2 billion to support the work in the AI Opportunities Action Plan, including the new UK Sovereign AI Unit, and an acknowledgement that more work needs to be done to drive widespread AI adoption and to scale and keep AI companies in the UK. It also included £86 billion in wider funding for R&D accelerator programmes including in AI.

• The government has backed both public sector and private sector AI as a tool for growth. This includes a significant uptake of AI across the NHS and other public sectors to drive productivity and balance the departmental budget cuts. 

• Whilst these announcements are good for the sector, it could be a while until these policies lead to economic growth. The government will also need to balance mass scale up of AI with clean energy commitments, particularly around data centres and infrastructure, as included in the AI Opportunities Action Plan. 

• Government may need to do more work to build public support for AI with London Tech Week discussions pointing to public fears over AI. A global survey published this week suggests that 43% of UK Gen Z workers are worried AI will replace them in the workplace. 

• Other tech policy developments, such as the Data (Use and Access) Bill debate around copyright and AI training, could lead to concerns amongst parliamentarians regarding the rapid adoption of AI leading to less desirable outcomes for society.

Additional reflections on the government’s approach to digital technologies are below.

ON AI:

• The government commitment towards making the UK the best place for AI involves significant investment. The Spending Review committed further funding of £2 billion to support the work in the AI Opportunities Action Plan, including the new UK Sovereign AI Unit. This is a key part of the government’s plans to ensure AI companies grow, scale and remain in the UK following high profile sales of UK AI companies to the US.

• The Sovereign AI Unit will need to be successful if the UK AI sector is to expand and contribute to growth.  However, keeping AI firms in the UK could be challenging due to AI start-ups often relying on a buy-out by a larger tech firm when securing investment. To try and address this, the government has also relaunched a VC fellowship programme to increase the capacity of the UK financial sector to invest in up-and-coming technology.

• Whilst there have been some notable outputs from the AI Opportunities Action Plan, including AI growth zones and other infrastructure commitments such as establishing data centres and new supercomputers, more needs to be done if we are to see the mass adoption and integration of AI across the UK economy.

• The government has acknowledged the importance of employment in growing the AI sector and is looking at skills and visas to ensure the UK can hire and retain talented individuals.

• There are still concerns amongst parliamentarians that the government is committing too fast to AI and has not fully considered the risks. The recent debate around copyright and AI as part of the Data (Use and Access) Bill highlights uncertainty around training methods and whether AI companies are using data in a lawful manner. UK digital regulators are prioritising AI, with the CMA and ICO scrutinising foundation models to understand how they comply with existing legislation.

ON DIGITALISING PUBLIC SERVICES: 

• The government is prioritising investment in digital and AI across public services, including the NHS, with an additional £1.2bn over the SR period to support cross-cutting digital priorities.

• Making data easier to access and share for research or public interest purposes is one of the changes in the Data (Use and Access) Bill and is crucial in helping the public sector develop and fine-tune AI tools and digital technologies that will work effectively. For example, it is currently difficult to share data between NHS Trusts or government departments, limiting the ability to make adaptable AI solutions (as shown by the release of smaller specialist AI tools such as the HMT internal search tool and the consultation tool).

• The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) will oversee this public sector transformation and set out the proposals in a Digital and AI Roadmap later this year. The public transformation is a key part of lowering government spending by automating and reducing the time and resource spent on administrative tasks. The government is likely to expect this to support key priority areas such as NHS waiting lists and access to wider healthcare.

This blog identifies some of the key recommendations made in each of the recently published AI Opportunities Action Plan’s sections (investing in the foundations of AI, pushing on cross-economy AI adoption, and securing the UK’s future with homegrown AI), highlighting those which offer the most promise to AI developers or adopters. It will then consider how Inline is well-positioned to leverage its tech expertise and relations with government to assist businesses in realising their AI ambitions.

On 17 July, King Charles III delivered the King's Speech, outlining the government's legislative programme for the new parliamentary session. The government has announced 40 bills which aim to unlock growth and ‘take the brakes off Britain’. This blog examines the proposals affecting the tech, climate, and energy sectors, and what business should expect as the government introduces legislation.

The electorate has given Labour the second-largest majority (after Tony Blair in 1997) in British parliamentary history since Clement Atlee led a Labour Government in 1945. While the result needs to be qualified by the low voter turnout (at an estimated 60%, it was the second-lowest in post-war history) and the low share of the vote that Labour obtained (at only approximately 34%), the size of its majority means the party will have a largely free hand in pushing its agenda through parliament. Now that the UK has a new Prime Minister, a new parliament, and, shortly, a new cabinet, we look at what Labour’s victory could mean for the tech as well as the climate and energy sectors.

In advance of the General Election on 4 July, Parliament has been formally dissolved. This Parliament, constituted following Boris Johnson’s landslide election victory in December 2019, has passed several pieces of important tech legislation, though some others have fallen by the wayside in the rush to finish business before dissolution. In this blog, we examine what the 2019-24 Parliament, and the government which commanded a majority within it, did for the tech sector. 

The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers (DMCC) Act establishes a new regime for digital competition in the UK. The Act also updates the Competition and Markets Authority’s (CMA) powers to enforce existing competition law and resolve consumer disputes, and protects consumers from unfair commercial, subscription, prepayment and saving schemes. The Act received royal assent on 24 May. In this blog, we discuss the new ex-ante competition regime established by the Act and what companies should expect as the CMA begins to enforce the legislation. The blog examines how the UK general election might influence the enforcement timeline. 

The prime minister has announced that he is calling a general election on 4 July. Here is what happens next.

As political institutions slowly emerge from their Christmas hibernation, we look at the key unresolved issues in tech regulation in the UK and the EU. 

In November 2023 the UK Government outlined its regulatory intentions for the cryptocasset industry. In this blog, we summarise the UK Government’s plans for the future regulation of cryptoassets and explain the next steps.

The Online Safety Bill was introduced in March 2022 to make the UK the ‘safest place in the world to be online’. After a long journey through Parliament, the Bill passed its final parliamentary stages on Tuesday 19 September and was granted royal assent on 26 October 2023, meaning it is now enshrined in law as the Online Safety Act (OSA). However, companies will not have to comply with most of the Act’s provisions immediately. Rather, many details are yet to be set out via secondary legislation and guidance. In this blog post, we take a look at the next steps under the UK’s new online safety regime.   

This is one of a series of blogs on how public policy is made in the UK. In this first blog, we look at how policies are created and what happens before they are brought to Parliament as a legislative bill.

Chancellor of the Exchequer Jeremy Hunt has published his Autumn Statement, outlining the UK Government’s fiscal policies for the next five years. The statement includes a number of measures of interest for the tech sector, which we summarise below.

Once again, the UK has a new Prime Minister. What does this further leadership change mean for the UK’s tech ecosystem and regulatory environment? In this blog, Inline Policy illuminates where a Rishi Sunak premiership could land on issues such as digital competition, data protection, online safety, net zero, artificial intelligence, innovation, and foreign relations.  

The Queen’s Speech on 10 May 2022 outlines all the Bills that the Government intends to introduce in the new Parliamentary session. It includes substantial tech policy reforms in areas in which the UK is diverging from EU policy for the first time. While there are various initiatives, they can broadly be categorised as, first, pro-innovation and pro-competition measures, and secondly, changes to improve the protection of consumers of tech. Here we take you through the main proposals.

With an increasing number of internet-connectable and interconnected devices, also known as the Internet of Things (IoT), being used in the UK, the Government has introduced the Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Bill to protect these products. This blog will examine the bill, its potential impact, some criticisms of it, and the next steps in the legislative process.

Much of the focus on this weekend’s election results has been on the Conservative successes in the so-called red wall but less attention has been paid to the inroads by other parties in the Tory’s ‘blue wall’ in the south east of England. In this blog, Matt Niblett rings a warning bell for the Tories.

Preventing illegal hate speech online is a priority for policymakers worldwide, and the need to do so is increasingly evident. How can governments strike the right balance between tackling the mechanisms and incentives behind the proliferation of illegal hateful content online, while also ensuring that platforms do not enable censorship? A closer look at present and future debates demonstrates the intricacies of keeping an ever-growing number of internet users safe and preserving their fundamental rights.

As the UK prepares some of the most ambitious online harms legislation in the world, the unprecedented efforts taken by tech companies to curb the spread of COVID-19 falsehoods have raised a number of questions for regulators and policymakers. The UK may need to adapt its original stance on online harms in order to face the ‘new normal’.

California’s recent regulation to address perceived imbalances in the gig economy (known as AB5) has set tongues wagging about the future of companies like Uber and Lyft. Given Europe’s reputation for being tough on tech giants, is a similar intervention on this side of the Atlantic now inevitable?

The spread of tiny chips into more and more everyday items promises a cumulative leap in convenience for consumers and productivity for businesses. Yet as ever more consumer devices become hooked up to the internet and the line between hardware and software blurs, the question of consumer protection and the need for new consumer regulations will receive greater attention.