--- title: How will Californians' rejection of Assembly Bill 5 impact the gig economy in Europe? description: The passage of Proposition 22 in California is a big victory for the sector, redefining the employment status of gig workers in the app-based economy. image: https://www.inlinepolicy.com/hubfs/shutterstock_216667807.jpg --- [![Inline Policy logo](https://www.inlinepolicy.com/hubfs/in-line-logo-horizontal-RGB-BLACK.svg "Inline Policy logo")](https://www.inlinepolicy.com/) [Talk to Us](https://www.inlinepolicy.com/contact-us) ![How will Californians' rejection of Assembly Bill 5 impact the gig economy in Europe?](https://www.inlinepolicy.com/hubfs/shutterstock_216667807.jpg) # How will Californians' rejection of Assembly Bill 5 impact the gig economy in Europe? by [Matthew Niblett](https://www.inlinepolicy.com/blog/author/matthew-niblett) on 17 Nov 2020 Amid the fallout from the U.S. election, you might be forgiven for failing to notice that something very significant happened for the gig economy on polling day. Voters in California approved Proposition 22, a ballot measure sponsored by Uber, Lyft, and Postmates, to classify ride hailing and delivery drivers as independent contractors, rather than employees, unless certain criteria are met. This means that, barring a legal challenge or repeal in the California state legislature, the gig economy companies will not have to adhere to Assembly Bill 5. This is a major victory for the sector. In a [previous blog ](https://www.inlinepolicy.com/blog/european-ab5)we explored whether AB5 would lead to similar regulatory interventions in Europe. To date, there has not been as comprehensive an attempt to bring gig workers within the ambit of traditional employment legislation as happened in California. Indeed, Proposition 22 may well give policymakers in Europe pause for thought when it comes to regulating gig work. The victory for the gig economy companies in the vote can, after all, be interpreted as a vindication of their business model by voters. The dispute in California predates the COVID-19 crisis, but to some extent this may have worked in the gig companies’ favour. Coronavirus has arguably shown us just how vulnerable gig economy workers are. After all, people have been forced to continue working during nationwide lockdowns, putting themselves at risk of infection in the process, because they are not entitled to sick pay or other welfare benefits associated with employment in modern states. However, the crisis has also shown consumers, and by extension, voters how reliant they are on the services provided by gig economy companies. Ride hailing vehicles seem much more attractive than crowded buses and trains in times of a pandemic, whilst deliveries of food, medicine, and groceries allow us to obtain what we need to live our lives without risking infection by going to the shops. We at Inline have touched on this particular tension [in an earlier blog post](https://www.inlinepolicy.com/blog/covid19-gig-economy). The victory for Proposition 22 can be explained, at least in part, by the fact that the first problem is much more solvable than the second. Gig economy companies have in many cases extended benefits to their workers such as sick pay and holidays, offsetting to an extent the costs associated with self-employment over employment. Coronavirus, on the other hand, will be around for the near future, despite stories of a vaccine, and we continue to rely on home deliveries and car journeys to get around, not least as many countries head into lockdown for a second wave this winter. Victory for Proposition 22 therefore begs the question: if gig work cannot be rolled into existing employment frameworks, what is the solution? COVID-19 has seen something of a crossing of the Rubicon by gig economy companies – it will be tricky for them to remove the benefits that they have recently granted to their workers. Uber’s CEO Dara Khosrowshahi has laid out his own thoughts, a “third way” that would see companies obliged to create benefits funds that workers can use to access different perks, from healthcare to paid time off. The [WorkerTech](https://www.inlinepolicy.com/understanding-workertech) revolution is already allowing workers to access different services and protections via technology. Victory for Proposition 22 and more flexible forms of working could well add some momentum to this sector, which in many places seeks to replicate employment benefits for the modern gig worker. The European Commission has pledged to review the situation of platform workers during its term. It, along with policymakers in London, Paris, Berlin, and elsewhere, might cast an eye across the Atlantic when deciding what steps to take next. Topics: [US Politics](https://www.inlinepolicy.com/blog/tag/us-politics), [Gig economy](https://www.inlinepolicy.com/blog/tag/gig-economy), [WorkerTech](https://www.inlinepolicy.com/blog/tag/workertech) ![Matthew Niblett](https://www.inlinepolicy.com/hs-fs/hubfs/Team%20pictures/Meet%20the%20team%20pictures/Matt%20N%20Inline%20Policy.jpg?width=100&height=100&name=Matt%20N%20Inline%20Policy.jpg) #### Written by [Matthew Niblett](https://www.inlinepolicy.com/blog/author/matthew-niblett) [**](https://www.linkedin.com/in/matthew-niblett-39b0a8138/) ### Get the latest updates from our blog ## Related Articles ![Is the gig up? Regulating platform work in the UK](https://www.inlinepolicy.com/hubfs/shutterstock_2660108273.jpg) [Is the gig up? Regulating platform work in the UK](https://www.inlinepolicy.com/blog/is-the-gig-up-regulating-platform-work-in-the-uk) This blog explores what plans to regulate gig-economy work could look like in the UK, suggesting examples ... [Read more](https://www.inlinepolicy.com/blog/is-the-gig-up-regulating-platform-work-in-the-uk) ![Supreme Court decision to overturn Chevron Deference signals shift in regulatory abilities](https://www.inlinepolicy.com/hubfs/shutterstock_2431677511.jpg) [Supreme Court decision to overturn Chevron Deference signals shift in regulatory abilities](https://www.inlinepolicy.com/blog/chevron_deference) On 28 June, the US Supreme Court overturned the ‘Chevron deference’, an administrative law principle allowing ... [Read more](https://www.inlinepolicy.com/blog/chevron_deference) ![What potholes prevent America's smooth transition to electric vehicles?](https://www.inlinepolicy.com/hubfs/shutterstock_1927995896.jpg) [What potholes prevent America's smooth transition to electric vehicles?](https://www.inlinepolicy.com/blog/america_electric_vehicles) The US has witnessed a rapid increase in electric vehicles (EVs) in recent years. In this blog, we will ... [Read more](https://www.inlinepolicy.com/blog/america_electric_vehicles) ![The State of US Tech Regulation in 2023](https://www.inlinepolicy.com/hubfs/shutterstock_1608843106.jpg) [The State of US Tech Regulation in 2023](https://www.inlinepolicy.com/blog/ecodesign-0) President Biden, in his State of the Union address laid out his vision for this year. In this blog, Inline ... [Read more](https://www.inlinepolicy.com/blog/ecodesign-0) ## Comments ### About ### Services ### Follow us ### Resources ### London Office [+44 (0)20 3735 5055](tel:+44%2020%203735%205055) 310 Vox Studios, 1-45 Durham Street, London, SE11 5JH ### Brussels Office [+32 (0)2 669 4283](tel:+32%202%20669%2042%2083) Avenue Marnix 13-17, 1000 Brussels Copyright 2026 Inline Policy Ltd 08719165 | Inline Policy Sprl 0687711093